Popular Comparisons:
⚡3-Second Selection Verdict
Daily & TestsPick Phi-4 Mini (Save 99%)
MicrosoftVerified

Phi-4 Mini

★ Save 99%
Input$0.04 / 1M
Output$0.08 / 1M
Context16K
CursorBench Pass Rate—
AnthropicVerified

Claude Opus 5.5

★ Massive Context 1M
Input$4.00 / 1M
Output$20.00 / 1M
Context1M
CursorBench Pass Rate57.8%

Pick your workflow, then your budget

Estimates use our price snapshot, excluding cache, retries, taxes and tools. Check availability for preview and legacy models.

Workload cost · USD (lower costs less)

Phi-4 Mini$0.56
Claude Opus 5.5$80.00

Context capacity · tokens (not recall accuracy)

Phi-4 Mini16,000
Claude Opus 5.51,000,000

CursorBench 4.0 · %

Phi-4 MiniNo verified data
Claude Opus 5.557.8%

Tool reliability, long-context recall and same-harness SWE-bench: untested, not zero.

CursorBench · 2026-10-20 ↗
Patch review example: why does an empty array slip through?

Editorial example, not measured model output. Review boundary contracts and regression tests; this is not a model ranking.

export function mean(values: number[]) {
  return values.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0)
    / values.length;
}

// mean([]) => NaN
// Missing an explicit empty-input contract
⚙️ Select ModelPhi-4 Mini vs Claude Opus 5.5
Slot 1Microsoft
Slot 2Anthropic
Slot 3
Phi-4 Mini VS Claude Opus 5.5
💳 View Plans↗

💰 Monthly Cost Simulation

Simulate monthly cost differences based on your estimated token usage volume

Monthly Input Tokens (Prompt)10 M tokens
Monthly Output Tokens (Completion)2 M tokens
Phi-4 Mini
$0.56/ mo
(in: $0.40 + out: $0.16)
Claude Opus 5.5
$80.00/ mo
(in: $40.00 + out: $40.00)
AttributePhi-4 MiniMicrosoftClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic
Input$0.04$4.00
Output$0.08$20.00
Context16K1M
CursorBench Pass Rate—57.8%
StatusVerifiedVerified
Tags & CapabilitiesFast, Low cost, Open sourceNew, Flagship, Reasoning, Coding, Agentic, Adaptive thinking, SOTA
LMArena Code#—#1
LMArena Agent#—#1
CursorBench#—#1
GDPx (SemiAnalysis)#—#1
Artificial Analysis#—#2
Vals AI#—#3
LiveBench#—#3
LMArena Text#—#2
ADSponsored