Popular Comparisons:
⚡3-Second Selection Verdict
Daily & TestsPick Kimi K2.7 Code (Save 73%)
Moonshot AIVerified

Kimi K2.7 Code

★ Save 73%
Input$1.20 / 1M
Output$4.80 / 1M
Context262K
CursorBench Pass Rate—
AnthropicVerified

Claude Opus 5.5

★ Massive Context 1M
Input$4.00 / 1M
Output$20.00 / 1M
Context1M
CursorBench Pass Rate—

Pick your workflow, then your budget

Estimates use our price snapshot, excluding cache, retries, taxes and tools. Check availability for preview and legacy models.

Workload cost · USD (lower costs less)

Kimi K2.7 Code$21.60
Claude Opus 5.5$80.00

Context capacity · tokens (not recall accuracy)

Kimi K2.7 Code262,144
Claude Opus 5.51,000,000

CursorBench 4.0 · %

Kimi K2.7 CodeNo verified data
Claude Opus 5.5No verified data

Tool reliability, long-context recall and same-harness SWE-bench: untested, not zero.

CursorBench · 2026-10-07 ↗
Patch review example: why does an empty array slip through?

Editorial example, not measured model output. Review boundary contracts and regression tests; this is not a model ranking.

export function mean(values: number[]) {
  return values.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0)
    / values.length;
}

// mean([]) => NaN
// Missing an explicit empty-input contract
⚙️ Select ModelKimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Opus 5.5
Slot 1Moonshot AI
Slot 2Anthropic
Slot 3
Kimi K2.7 Code VS Claude Opus 5.5
💳 View Plans↗

💰 Monthly Cost Simulation

Simulate monthly cost differences based on your estimated token usage volume

Monthly Input Tokens (Prompt)10 M tokens
Monthly Output Tokens (Completion)2 M tokens
Kimi K2.7 Code
$21.60/ mo
(in: $1.2 + out: $4.8)
Claude Opus 5.5
$80.00/ mo
(in: $4 + out: $20)
AttributeKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIClaude Opus 5.5Anthropic
Input$1.20$4.00
Output$4.80$20.00
Context262K1M
CursorBench Pass Rate——
StatusVerifiedVerified
Tags & CapabilitiesCodingNew, Flagship, Reasoning, Coding, Agentic, Adaptive thinking, SOTA
LMArena Code#42#1
LMArena Agent#—#1
CursorBench#—#1
Artificial Analysis#48#1
Vals AI#—#3
LiveBench#42#2
LMArena Text#—#2
ADSponsored