AI Coding Live News

SemiAnalysis releases GDPx, an agentic benchmark of 206 tasks across 11 high-value domains where the top model, Claude Opus 5.5, scores just 12%

On Nov 2, semiconductor and AI research firm SemiAnalysis released GDPx, a benchmark of agentic capability across 11 domains: chip design, cybersecurity, biology, finance, legal, quant trading, recursive self-improvement (RSI), hardware design, materials science, alignment and software engineering. Its 206 tasks were built by 14 specialist data partners, with SemiAnalysis doing final QA. On the official leaderboard Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 12.0%, followed by Gemini 4 Carbon at 10.9% and GPT-6 Astra at 9.6%; nearly every model scores 0 on finance and legal. SemiAnalysis says safety classifiers drag down Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, and plans a new version every 3–6 months. All scores are as reported by SemiAnalysis.

SemiAnalysis releases GDPx, an agentic benchmark of 206 tasks across 11 high-value domains where the top model, Claude Opus 5.5, scores just 12%

Key Takeaways

  • Scale: 11 domains, 14 data partners and 206 tasks, with a default time limit of 8 hours per task (GDPx site)
  • Leaderboard (as reported by SemiAnalysis): Claude Opus 5.5 12.0%, Gemini 4 Carbon 10.9%, GPT-6 Astra 9.6%, Muse Wonder Full 9.0%, Claude Fable 5.1 8.5%, GPT 6.1 Sol 8.4%, Claude Sonnet 5.5 8.2%
  • Lower tier and open weights: DeepSeek 4.1 Flash 1017 5.4%, GPT-6 Luna 5.1%, Grok 4.7 3.9%, GLM 5.3 2.7%; almost every model scores 0 on finance and legal
  • Method: each model runs in its native harness where one exists (Claude Code for Opus, Codex for Astra, Antigravity for Carbon), otherwise OpenCode; the headline is pass@1 over three attempts with all domains weighted equally (SemiAnalysis blog)
  • By domain: Opus 5.5 wins quant trading, hardware and chip design; Gemini 4 Carbon wins biology and software engineering; GPT-6 Astra wins RSI and materials science; Muse Wonder Full is the strongest cyber model
Read full story

Nanjing University LAMDA Unveils AgenticBBO-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Black-Box Optimization, Outperforming Top Numerical Solvers

Black-box optimization (BBO) poses foundational computational hurdles across chip design, database parameter tuning, hyperparameter optimization, and molecular engineering where objective function evaluations are prohibitively expensive and gradients are unavailable. Traditional Bayesian optimization and evolutionary algorithms rely strictly on numerical samples while discarding rich task semantics, whereas direct LLM prompting struggles with numerical precision and hallucinations. Researchers from Nanjing University's National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology (LAMDA Group) introduce AgenticBBO-Bench (arXiv:2610.12183), the first unified cross-domain benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in black-box optimization. Spanning synthetic functions, hyperparameter tuning, database configuration, chip layout, and molecular design under a standardized finite-budget protocol, Agentic BBO achieves superior family-averaged scores over direct LLM methods across all five domains and outperforms the strongest numerical optimizers in four. Evaluating seven frontier LLMs within the Codex agent harness establishes the Pareto frontier of performance and inference cost, with the benchmark and harness fully open-sourced.

Key Takeaways

  • Nanjing University LAMDA releases AgenticBBO-Bench, benchmarking LLM agents across chip design, DB tuning, and molecular optimization
  • Agentic BBO outperforms direct LLM prompting across all 5 domains and beats leading numerical optimizers in 4 out of 5 areas
  • Maps Pareto frontier of frontier models within Codex harness, cutting required optimization steps by over 38% under finite budgets
Read full story